Recently I attended a movie at the Seattle International Film Festival. The title of the movie was,
Ai Weiwei: Never Sorry. It is a documentary about the Chinese artist Ai Weiwei. Ai Weiwei gained international acclaim while serving as a design consultant for the stadium built for the 2008 Olympics in China. Since that time he has been making art and bringing the world's attention to what it is like to be an outspoken critic of the Chinese government. After the horrible Sichuan earthquake in 2008, he became obsessed with documenting the names of the children who died in the flimsy school buildings. The Chinese government continues to minimize and deny the scale of the death and damage there. For speaking out, his studio was destroyed and he has been beaten, imprisoned, censored and fined.
Above is an image of a bracelet I made in around 2000. It is made of credit cards, synthetic rubies and sterling silver. The title of the bracelet is,"Path of the Eagle" and it is a commentary on the way Americans are encouraged to accumulate debt. It could also be interpreted as commentary on our national debt. The reason I celebrate July 4th is because I am very aware that I am privileged to be an artist in a country where free speech is encouraged and valued. That privilege was something I was born with but my ancestors had to fight for. The story of Ai Weiwei is a good example of why we must never take the First Amendment for granted. Have a happy and safe holiday, NW
Wednesday, July 4, 2012
Friday, June 8, 2012
Spring Clean Your Brain at the Museum
This morning I played hooky from work and took in the new show at the Seattle Art Museum Downtown. The show is called Ancestral Modern and it is a collection of paintings by contemporary Australian aboriginal artists. This collection was assembled by Robert Kaplan and Margaret Levi, who are husband-and-wife and serious art junkies. Bob and Margaret also collect the work of contemporary American artists, but the Australian paintings and sculptures have been their passion for some time. They have made excellent choices and collected the work of individual artists in depth, meaning they have multiple works from each artist. This exhibit is quite large and takes up as much space as the recent Gauguin exhibit did. There is a lot of work and a great diversity of work. The artists in the show represent the physical and spiritual world with vocabularies that turned my brain inside out and gave it a good shake. That's the gift of living in a city with art museums; no matter what the weather is like outside, a trip to the museum can brighten your climate on the inside.
I know many people are intimidated by art museums and large exhibits. My first real teaching job was coordinating a freshman-level art survey class at Central Washington University in Ellensburg. I had about 100 students each term and none of them were art majors. Every quarter I made a deal with my students: they could write a paper or they could go on a field trip with me to Seattle to see galleries and the Seattle Art Museum. I hoped most would choose the field trip; after spending months looking at slides of art, I wanted them to see the real thing. I knew that most were art virgins that had never crossed the threshold of an art museum in their life. My goal was to initiate them, help them feel comfortable in a museum, and do my part in creating future art patrons.
What follows is advice I gave my students for how enjoy yourself at art museums:
I know many people are intimidated by art museums and large exhibits. My first real teaching job was coordinating a freshman-level art survey class at Central Washington University in Ellensburg. I had about 100 students each term and none of them were art majors. Every quarter I made a deal with my students: they could write a paper or they could go on a field trip with me to Seattle to see galleries and the Seattle Art Museum. I hoped most would choose the field trip; after spending months looking at slides of art, I wanted them to see the real thing. I knew that most were art virgins that had never crossed the threshold of an art museum in their life. My goal was to initiate them, help them feel comfortable in a museum, and do my part in creating future art patrons.
What follows is advice I gave my students for how enjoy yourself at art museums:
- Give yourself plenty of time. Looking at art is best when you're not in a hurry. Plan to spend at least half a day and give yourself time to absorb what you're looking at. Going to a museum is a treat for me, not an obligation I squeeze in between errands.
- You don't have to see most shows in any particular order. Although it's best to see an exhibit in the order the curators have laid it out in, crowded exhibits often make this impossible. When I walk into a big show I tend to gravitate first to where there are the least amount of people. I often walk through a show one way and then turnaround and see it again from another direction.
- Go through the exhibit at your own pace and plan to meet your friends at the end. That way you can spend as much time as you want and not have to worry about losing the rest of your party. I do not advise taking small children if you want to enjoy the show.
- If you really want to see a big exhibit, go several times and focus each time on a different part of the exhibit. The human brain can only take in so much information at any one time and really absorb it. When you get tired, you can miss a lot.
- Eat a good meal before you go and take breaks at the museum café when you need to. As my friend Lori Talcott says,"Culture is famishing."
That concludes this afternoon's lecture. I highly recommend taking in Ancestral Modern. It will be on display through September 2, 2012.
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
What is Talent?
I recently read the bestselling book by Geoff Colvin
entitled, Talent is Overrated: What Really
Separates World-Class Performers from Everybody Else. This book drops a bomb on the myth that some people are born
with talent. Using examples from sports, business, and the arts, Colvin
describes the process that leads to exceptional performance. Basically, what
most people describe as talent is the result of rigorous training, the critique
process and thousands of hours spent in deliberate
practice.
He explains a prodigy like Tiger Woods as someone who had
the advantage of superior training at very early age and invested the time so
that by age 17 he was a lot better at golf than most people his age. What was
rare was that he also had the drive to excel.
I recommend this book to anyone considering a career in
the arts. I have always maintained that talent will only get you so far and success
is the result of years of hard work. I would even go so far as to say that a
natural aptitude towards something could hurt a person's development. In my own
life there were always people in high school and college that were far better
artists than me. The difference has been that I had to work harder and
therefore learned how to work hard. When something comes easily to you, you
don't learn how to work. What advantages I had came from many hours spent making
things, especially sewing my own clothes. Sewing taught me patience and I was motivated to improve because I liked nice clothes. I also had parents that
encouraged me and paid for lessons and materials. I was lucky to live in a town
where we had good teachers and examples of good professional art I could look
at. I enjoyed making things so I spent a lot of time doing it.
The doorknob locket is a pendant I made when I was a senior
in high school. It came about because I was able to talk my way into a jewelry class
for college upperclassmen at what was then Central Washington State College. The
professor, Ken Cory, allowed to me to attend his class on the condition that I
buy all my own tools. I think he thought that would get rid of me. It didn't
and the opportunity to work with people who were far better than me was a huge
asset. Ken pushed me to put more thought in my art. The heart image is also student
work I made at Central in around 1977. I am a living example of why we need to advocate
for the arts education in the public schools.
Monday, April 30, 2012
That's All Folks!
On January 2 of 1989, my daughter Avery was
born. It was an amazing year and I got to stay home and watch TV because I had
a new baby. There was a smorgasbord of disasters that year; the Tammy Faye and
Jimmy Baker PTL scandal, the fall of the Berlin Wall, Hurricane Hugo, the San
Francisco Earthquake and the Exxon Valdez oil spill to name a few. Many years later when a local art gallery invited me to make a piece of jewelry about my favorite year, I looked up 1989 on the web and was reminded that Mel Blanc had died that
year. I got sucked into YouTube clips of him on Carson and Letterman and Jack Benny
and Wikipedia had 12 pages on the guy. Anyway, I was hooked because Bugs
Bunny, Porky Pig, Daffy Duck, Tweety Bird, Wile E. Coyote, the Roadrunner and
Pepe LePew were just too big a part of my childhood to ignore. I hunted on
the web for Looney Tunes stamps since I knew the USPS had done a series but
they were too costly and rare, so I kept surfing and found Australian and
Kyrgrzstan stamps. Mel Blanc was loved the world over as the voice for hundreds
of his cartoon friends and he also developed their characters. He dictated that
the inscription on his tombstone should say, “That’s All Folks!” and so it
does. He was buried in Los Angeles, of course.
The name of this bracelet is "That's All Folks!" and it was created in 2010 for an exhibition of jewelry at Facere Jewelry Art in downtown Seattle to honor Karen Lorene, the owner and founder of the gallery. Since she was celebrating her 70th birthday, 70 artists were asked to chose a year within her lifetime and I chose 1989. This is what my assistant, Kyle Rees and I came up with. On the bangle is etched classic lines from some of Mel's best loved characters: Tweety Bird, "I tawt I taw
a putty tat!" Pepe LePe, "Ah my darling, it is love at first sight is it not,
no?", Porky Pig, "Thaaaaaat’s
all folks!", Sylvester,"SSSuffering
SSSSSuccotash", Daffy Duck, "Hold
everything Fatso!", Bugs Bunny, "What’s up, Doc?" and many more. Yes, the bracelet is still for sale.
WORDERun
Thursday, April 19, 2012
WHAT HAPPENED TO SILVER PRICES?
I just checked and today, April 19, 2012, the price of an ounce of silver is $31.90. In the past couple of years, silver prices have habitually been above $30. an ounce, but historically this is pretty high. I started working with silver as a student in 1972, when the price hovered around $4. an ounce. In between 1792 and 1972, the price of silver didn't change all that much. Then in 1978 or 79 the Hunt Brothers started speculating in gold and silver and the price jumped to over $25. an ounce. I was in graduate school at that time and wanted to make a silver object to enter in a competition and maybe win some prize money. Since I was broke, I decided to carve up a bunch of spoons my grandmother had given me. I flattened them, cut out some shapes and reassembled them into a patchwork cup. The cup did make it into the competition and I did win a little money for me and my school, the University of Georgia.
After a while, silver prices calmed down again and it became the default metal in my studio. Recently the speculators have taken over the market again and now every time we start a project in the shop, I feel dizzy when I calculate the cost of making it in silver. Just to show you, I borrowed this graph showing the change in silver prices between 1994 and today. It's great if you are selling scrap, but discouraging if you are a young jewelry maker in school or just starting out. NW
P.S. My professor in graduate school, Gary Noffke, pointed out my math was wrong in my previous blog on the age of the golden helmet stolen from the Bagdad Museum. It is 4700 years old!
P.S. My professor in graduate school, Gary Noffke, pointed out my math was wrong in my previous blog on the age of the golden helmet stolen from the Bagdad Museum. It is 4700 years old!
Friday, April 13, 2012
Who Needs Beauty?
WHO NEEDS BEAUTY?
Lately I have been going to art museums and seeing work that either insults my intelligence or insults my aesthetic. Okay, I acknowledge that aesthetics, the study of beauty, is culturally defined. In other words, not everyone agrees on what is beautiful. However, assuming that we still have standards within my own culture (21st century-middle-class-educated-American), what I am seeing is either a lack of understanding of beauty or a concerted effort to create something ugly. I have made some ugly things in my time but never intentionally. I can not imagine getting up in the morning and telling myself," Let's go to the studio and make something really ugly." I start with very modest materials, often things that nobody notices but give reference my place and time on earth. Then I try to assemble something that is thoughtful and beautiful. I don't always pull it off but that's the gamble of being an artist.
This is an image of a gold helmet from Ur dated 2700 BC. I scanned this image from a book I bought long ago when I was an art student (during the later part of the 20th Century), Jewelry Through the Ages. This helmet has been missing since the war in Iraq when the Baghdad Museum was looted. When I think of beauty, especially man made beauty, I often think of this helmet. I'm pretty certain it was considered beautiful 2900 years ago when it was first made. Thank goodness it was made of gold which doesn't deteriorate, because we at least got to photograph it before it disappeared. The point I'm trying to make is that the beauty of this object is undisputed almost 3 millennium after it was made.
I think the desire to seek and create beauty is innate in humans. Who needs beauty? I do. By the way, if you happen to see this helmet somewhere, call the U S government. They are looking to return it to the museum.
Lately I have been going to art museums and seeing work that either insults my intelligence or insults my aesthetic. Okay, I acknowledge that aesthetics, the study of beauty, is culturally defined. In other words, not everyone agrees on what is beautiful. However, assuming that we still have standards within my own culture (21st century-middle-class-educated-American), what I am seeing is either a lack of understanding of beauty or a concerted effort to create something ugly. I have made some ugly things in my time but never intentionally. I can not imagine getting up in the morning and telling myself," Let's go to the studio and make something really ugly." I start with very modest materials, often things that nobody notices but give reference my place and time on earth. Then I try to assemble something that is thoughtful and beautiful. I don't always pull it off but that's the gamble of being an artist.
This is an image of a gold helmet from Ur dated 2700 BC. I scanned this image from a book I bought long ago when I was an art student (during the later part of the 20th Century), Jewelry Through the Ages. This helmet has been missing since the war in Iraq when the Baghdad Museum was looted. When I think of beauty, especially man made beauty, I often think of this helmet. I'm pretty certain it was considered beautiful 2900 years ago when it was first made. Thank goodness it was made of gold which doesn't deteriorate, because we at least got to photograph it before it disappeared. The point I'm trying to make is that the beauty of this object is undisputed almost 3 millennium after it was made.
I think the desire to seek and create beauty is innate in humans. Who needs beauty? I do. By the way, if you happen to see this helmet somewhere, call the U S government. They are looking to return it to the museum.
Monday, April 9, 2012
Jewelry Idea Sources
Where Do You Get Your Ideas?
People often ask me where the ideas for my jewelry
come from. Most of the time the topics address a specific incident, something
that happened to me or someone else I know. I try to take that incident and
distill it down to the essence of the situation so that other people can see
themselves in the narrative. An example would be the necklace below, The
Revenants. The idea for the necklace came from reading a poem by the American
poet, Billy Collins, who often writes about his dog and some old photos I found
after my grandmother died. The photos dated from the early 20th century
when my grandmother was a girl and are of people posing with their pets. The
poem by Collins is told in the voice of his deceased dog that he had to put
down. On the back of each of the snapshots I included information my
grandmother recorded, like names and places and dates. To this, I added a
narrative told in the voice of the pet in the picture. The narratives and the
Collins poem are intended to be humorous. However, whenever I have had to
put one of my pets to sleep, I have felt immense guilt. We all do; no one
likes to watch their pet suffer, but we suffer when we end their misery.
The necklace was made a few months after my old cat, Louis Armstrong made
his final trip to the vet's office. He was my buddy and I miss him.
Many times people have commissioned me to make
something that is personal for them or a significant other. Below is a
necklace Robert Kaplan commissioned me to make for his wife, Margaret Levi,
when she directed the Harry Bridges Center for Labor Studies at the University
of Washington. To better understand her work, I read about Harry Bridges, the
man who organized the longshoremen and helped create the ILWU. I also read a
lot about the history of the Port of Seattle and the evolution from loading and
unloading the ships by hand with a hook to the modern day crane and container
technology. The end result was a necklace with arms and hands holding
hooks that grasped ebony bars, since originally the major export from the
Pacific Northwest was timber. The beads at the back are made of silver American
quarters pierced with letters that spell ILWU on one side and UNION on the
other. The necklace celebrates the history of the longshoremen and labor,
which is a subject Margaret teaches. I loved working on this commission.
It's one of my favorite necklaces.
Another commission came my way when the curator
Barbara Johns retired from Tacoma Art Museum. Her staff called me and asked me
to make something for her. I was honored to be asked but I needed an idea. I
looked through some of the catalogs Barbara had written in her tenure at the
Museum and decided to make a necklace about writing that was also a record of
her major exhibitions at TAM. The necklace is a collection of handmade beads. I
used IBM typewriter balls as a reference to writing and then made smaller beads
from silver Precious Metal Clay and stamped into them the exhibition titles.
The clasp was fabricated from ornamental silver wire made by the late
jewelry artist Ken Cory and Barbara and I had collaborated on an
exhibition and catalog about his work. I think she liked it because every
time I ran into her for several years afterwards she was wearing it.
Many artists are reluctant to take on custom
work or commissions. I have always enjoyed them because jewelry as an art
form has always had an intimate association with the lives of the people who
wear it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
+copy.jpg)









